Best Jira Reporting App in 2026: Practical Comparison Guide
Choosing Jira Reporting App Tools? Compare 7 options by fit, deployment, pricing, and tradeoffs. Read the guide before you decide.
When sprint updates, cross-project work, and executive reports all live in different places, it’s hard to tell what’s actually on track. This guide compares seven options: ONES.com, Jira Dashboards and Reports, eazyBI Reports and Charts for Jira, Custom Charts for Jira, Rich Filters for Jira Dashboards, Structure for Jira, and Power BI Connector for Jira by Alpha Serve.
You’ll find options for straightforward sprint reporting, interactive dashboards, deeper analysis, and reporting across complex work. I’ll help you see where a Jira reporting app may be enough—and when a broader platform such as ONES.com is worth considering.
Quick Summary
The right Jira reporting app depends on whether you need native visibility, richer dashboards, advanced analytics, or a broader project platform.
Start with Jira Dashboards and Reports if built-in reporting covers your team’s sprint and project updates. Consider an app when you need more flexible charts, cross-project views, or deeper analysis.
ONES.com is a broader option for teams evaluating Jira alternatives alongside reporting, workflow control, and deployment flexibility. For Jira-centered teams, eazyBI, Custom Charts, Rich Filters, Structure, and Power BI Connector address different reporting needs.
- Choose native Jira reports for straightforward project and agile tracking.
- Choose an add-on when you want specific dashboard, analysis, or data-export capabilities.
- Compare deployment, workflow fit, and total app costs before deciding.
How We Evaluate and Select These Tools
We compare each option by how well it supports real reporting decisions, not by the number of charts it can display.
- Reporting depth: Can you track sprint progress, project health, trends, and cross-project status?
- Agile execution: Does it help teams review work, spot blockers, and understand delivery progress?
- Workflow flexibility: Can reports reflect your fields, workflows, and project structure?
- Setup and usability: Can project leads and stakeholders find useful views without unnecessary configuration?
- Deployment and migration fit: Does the option suit your Jira environment, data needs, and possible platform changes?
- Cost and tool sprawl: Consider subscription and app costs alongside the number of separate tools your team must maintain.
Top Jira Reporting App Options Shortlist
- ONES.com — A broader project and software development management platform with built-in reporting, configurable workflows, and cloud or self-managed deployment.
- Jira Dashboards and Reports — Jira’s built-in option for standard project, issue, and agile reporting.
- eazyBI Reports and Charts for Jira — An add-on for multidimensional analysis and custom reports from Jira data.
- Custom Charts for Jira — An add-on for creating visual Jira dashboards and charts with less reliance on manual spreadsheet work.
- Rich Filters for Jira Dashboards — A dashboard companion for adding interactive filters and more flexible Jira report views.
- Structure for Jira — A way to organize work into hierarchies and report across projects, teams, and initiatives.
- Power BI Connector for Jira by Alpha Serve — A connector for bringing Jira data into Microsoft Power BI reporting.
Jira Reporting App Comparison Table
| Tool | Best For | Deployment | Pricing | Key Feature | Free Plan |
|---|
| ONES.com | Teams considering a broader Jira alternative with project tracking, workflows, and reporting | Cloud, On-Premise, Private Cloud, Air-gapped | Free plan for up to 30 seats; paid options vary | Requirements, tasks, progress, risks, workflows, knowledge, and delivery governance in one platform | Yes, up to 30 seats |
| Jira Dashboards and Reports | Teams needing standard Jira project and agile reporting | Jira Cloud or Data Center, depending on Jira edition | Included with Jira; Jira plan pricing varies | Native dashboards, gadgets, and agile reports | Depends on the Jira plan |
| eazyBI Reports and Charts for Jira | Teams building detailed, multidimensional reports from Jira data | Jira Cloud or Data Center, depending on app edition | Marketplace pricing varies by edition and team size | Custom analysis with report dimensions and measures | Trial availability may vary |
| Custom Charts for Jira | Teams creating visual dashboards from Jira issues and fields | Jira Cloud or Data Center, depending on app edition | Marketplace pricing varies by edition and team size | Configurable charts for Jira dashboards | Trial availability may vary |
| Rich Filters for Jira Dashboards | Teams that need interactive filters across Jira dashboard gadgets | Jira Cloud or Data Center, depending on app edition | Marketplace pricing varies by edition and team size | Flexible dashboard filtering and views | Trial availability may vary |
| Structure for Jira | Teams reporting on hierarchical work across projects and initiatives | Jira Cloud or Data Center, depending on app edition | Marketplace pricing varies by edition and team size | Flexible work hierarchies and roll-up views | Trial availability may vary |
| Power BI Connector for Jira by Alpha Serve | Teams analyzing Jira data in Microsoft Power BI | Jira Cloud or Data Center, depending on connector edition | Marketplace pricing varies by edition and team size | Jira data connectivity for Power BI reports | Trial availability may vary |
Detailed Reviews of the Best Jira Reporting App Options in 2026
Product Overview
ONES.com is a Jira alternative for teams that want project tracking and reporting as part of a wider software development management platform—not as a separate dashboard add-on. It brings requirements, tasks, sprints, workflows, knowledge, and delivery visibility into one system, so a project report can be connected to the work and decisions behind it.
For a team reviewing sprint health, for example, ONES.com can bring task status, progress, risks, and team updates into the same project context. Built-in reporting supports day-to-day visibility, while custom workflows and fields let teams reflect how work actually moves from planning through review and delivery.
Why It Was Selected
ONES.com is a strong fit for this comparison because reporting is more useful when it reflects live project work rather than relying on a collection of separately configured apps. Teams can track agile execution, adapt workflows, and review progress within one platform. That can help when a reporting problem is really a process problem: teams lack consistent fields, updates live in different places, or managers cannot see delivery risks until a deadline is close.
It also suits organizations assessing a move away from a Jira-centered setup. Jira-compatible workflows can help make familiar processes easier to carry forward, while ONES.com offers a broader system for project and software delivery management. Cloud, on-premise, private cloud, and air-gapped deployment options give teams more choice over where project information is managed.
Core Capabilities
- Pain: Sprint progress is scattered across issues and informal updates. Capability: Track tasks, sprints, and project progress in shared project views. Result: Teams can spot stalled work and discuss status using the same source of information.
- Pain: Reports hide delivery risk until it affects a milestone. Capability: Review progress and risk signals alongside active project work. Result: Leads have a clearer basis for prioritizing follow-up.
- Pain: Work items arrive as broad, unclear requirements. Capability: Manage requirements and break them into trackable tasks. Result: Reports connect planned outcomes to work the team can actually execute.
- Pain: Different teams use fields and stages inconsistently. Capability: Configure custom fields and workflows. Result: Reporting can follow the team’s process instead of forcing every project into one template.
- Pain: Managers spend meetings collecting updates manually. Capability: Use built-in reporting and summaries of project activity. Result: Status reviews can focus more on decisions and less on assembling basic facts.
- Pain: Repetitive handoffs slow down execution. Capability: Apply workflow automation to routine project steps. Result: Work moves through defined stages with less manual coordination.
- Pain: Decisions and delivery notes are separated from project work. Capability: Keep knowledge-base content and collaboration connected to project context. Result: Teams can find useful background while reviewing progress or planning next steps.
- Pain: A reporting setup depends on many disconnected tools. Capability: Combine tracking, workflows, reporting, and delivery governance in one platform. Result: Teams can reduce tool sprawl and keep project information easier to review.
Pros
- Reporting sits alongside requirements, sprint execution, workflow, and delivery tracking.
- Custom workflows and fields help teams align project data with their operating process.
- Deployment choices include Cloud, On-Premise, Private Cloud, and air-gapped environments, with feature parity between cloud and self-hosted versions.
- A free plan supports up to 30 seats, making it practical to evaluate with a real team.
Cons
ONES.com is a broader Jira alternative, not a reporting-only app. Teams looking solely to add a specialized visualization to an established Jira instance should first decide whether they want a standalone reporting layer or are evaluating a wider change to project tracking and delivery management.
Pricing
ONES.com offers a Free plan for up to 30 seats. Paid pricing depends on the selected plan and deployment requirements, so teams should confirm current costs directly with ONES.com. Cloud and self-hosted options make it possible to assess both subscription-based and controlled-deployment needs.
Best For
ONES.com is best for software teams that want reporting tied to project tracking, agile execution, and configurable workflows—and for organizations considering a Jira alternative rather than another isolated dashboard app. It is especially relevant when teams need shared visibility across delivery, deployment flexibility, and fewer disconnected tools.
Jira Dashboards and Reports
Product Overview
Jira Dashboards and Reports are the platform’s built-in options for tracking work and sharing project status. Dashboards combine gadgets—such as charts, issue lists, and filter results—while reports provide views tailored to common Scrum, Kanban, and issue-tracking needs. It is a practical starting point if your team already manages delivery in Jira and wants visibility without adding another reporting product.
Why It Was Selected
For a guide to Jira reporting apps, the native tools are the baseline to compare against. They can answer everyday questions like what is in progress, which issues are overdue, and how a sprint is tracking. Teams can build dashboards around saved filters and share them with colleagues, making routine status checks easier than assembling updates by hand.
Core Capabilities
Dashboards let you arrange gadgets that display saved-filter results, pie charts, activity, assigned work, and other project data. Built-in agile reports cover common needs such as sprint burndown, velocity, control charts, and cumulative flow, depending on the project type and configuration. Issue reports can also help show trends such as created versus resolved work. You can tailor views with filters and dashboard layouts, but the reporting model largely follows Jira’s issue fields, project settings, and available gadgets.
Pros
The biggest advantage is convenience: there is no separate app to install or maintain, and the dashboards use live Jira work data. Teams can create focused views for a sprint, project, or role, then share them for regular check-ins. The built-in agile reports are useful for spotting delivery patterns, while saved filters provide a flexible way to define which issues appear.
Cons
Reporting depth is limited compared with specialist analytics apps. Cross-project analysis, complex calculations, historical snapshots, and highly customized visualizations can require workarounds or an add-on. Gadget dashboards can also become cluttered, and the usefulness of reports depends on consistent issue fields, statuses, and workflow practices. If stakeholders need polished executive reporting or data combined from several systems, the native tools may not be enough.
Pricing
These features are included with Jira rather than sold as a separate reporting app. Your cost depends on the Jira plan, deployment, and team size; check current plan limits and feature availability before building a reporting process around a specific capability.
Best For
Jira teams that need straightforward sprint and project visibility, shared operational dashboards, and basic issue reporting should start here. If you regularly export data to spreadsheets or need deeper trend analysis, custom metrics, or reporting across multiple data sources, compare the native features with a dedicated analytics app before committing.
eazyBI Reports and Charts for Jira
Product Overview
eazyBI Reports and Charts for Jira is an analytics app for building custom reports and dashboards from Jira data. It goes beyond Jira’s standard charts with multidimensional analysis, calculated measures, and drill-downs, which can help when a team needs to investigate trends rather than just display current status. It works with Jira Cloud and Data Center, with setup and available options depending on the deployment.
Why It Was Selected
It’s a strong fit for a comparison of Jira reporting apps because it can answer questions that basic dashboard gadgets often cannot: Which issue types are driving cycle time? How has sprint completion changed over several months? Where are unresolved defects accumulating? The tradeoff is that getting useful answers usually takes more configuration than adding a ready-made chart.
Core Capabilities
eazyBI imports Jira data into a multidimensional model, then lets teams build reports using dimensions such as project, issue type, assignee, status, and time. You can create calculated measures, define custom dimensions, and use MDX for more advanced calculations. Reports can include charts and tables, support drill-down into underlying issues, and be assembled into dashboards or shared through Jira. Depending on the setup, teams can also bring in data from other sources, which is useful when Jira alone does not contain the measures needed for a cross-team view.
Pros
The reporting is flexible enough for agile execution, portfolio tracking, and historical trend analysis. Drill-downs help connect a high-level metric to the Jira issues behind it, and calculated measures can reduce the need to export data for every analysis. Teams with established reporting requirements can reuse reports instead of rebuilding one-off spreadsheets each week.
Cons
eazyBI has a real learning curve. Administrators may need to understand the data model and MDX before producing complex reports, and importing, defining, and maintaining data can take time. It is a reporting layer, not a substitute for improving inconsistent Jira workflows or issue data; unreliable inputs still produce unreliable metrics. It also adds an app dependency and cost to a Jira environment, and its depth may be unnecessary for teams that only need a few simple charts.
Pricing
eazyBI is a paid Jira Marketplace app, with pricing dependent on factors such as Jira deployment and user tier. Cloud and Data Center packaging can differ, so check the current Marketplace listing for the applicable price and trial terms before budgeting.
Best For
Choose eazyBI when Jira is already your system of record and you need detailed, reusable analysis across projects, sprints, or longer time periods. If your larger goal is to replace Jira rather than add reporting to it, ONES.com is a Jira alternative that brings project tracking, workflows, and reporting into a broader project-management platform.
Custom Charts for Jira
Product Overview
Custom Charts for Jira is a Jira Marketplace app for building visual reports and tables from Jira issue data. It adds configurable gadgets to dashboards, so teams can turn saved filters and project fields into charts without exporting everything to a spreadsheet. It focuses on making Jira data easier to read, rather than replacing Jira’s project tracking or providing a separate analytics platform.
Why It Was Selected
It’s a practical option for teams whose reporting needs have outgrown Jira’s standard charts but don’t justify a full business-intelligence setup. For example, a delivery lead can create a dashboard showing open work by status, compare issue counts across projects, or share a table of overdue tasks with stakeholders. The appeal is speed: reports sit alongside the Jira work people already update.
Core Capabilities
Teams can build dashboard charts and tables from Jira issues, choose fields to group or summarize, and apply filters to focus on a project, team, or work type. Common visual formats include bar, pie, and line charts. Gadgets can be arranged on dashboards for different audiences, and the reports can use Jira fields and JQL-based filters to reflect the team’s workflow. This makes it easier to track sprint work, status distribution, issue volume, and overdue items without assembling each view manually.
Pros
The main advantage is accessibility: non-analysts can create useful visualizations without learning a separate reporting language. It works with existing Jira issues and dashboards, and configurable groupings make it easier to tailor views for project reviews, team standups, or leadership updates. For routine agile reporting, that can reduce repetitive spreadsheet work and make delivery bottlenecks more visible.
Cons
Custom Charts is still tied to the quality and structure of your Jira data. If teams use inconsistent statuses, fields, or issue conventions, charts can look polished while telling an incomplete story. It is also a reporting add-on, not a data warehouse: complex cross-system analysis, advanced data modeling, or broader portfolio analytics may require another tool. Dashboard owners also need to maintain filters and access settings as projects change, and adding an app brings another subscription and administration consideration.
Pricing
Custom Charts is a paid Jira Marketplace app, with pricing based on factors such as deployment and user tier. Check the current Marketplace listing for your Jira edition and team size; trial and billing terms can change.
Best For
Choose it if your team wants clearer Jira dashboards and quick, configurable charts built from issue data. It is less suitable when reporting must combine multiple business systems or support deep analytical modeling. If you’re evaluating a broader Jira alternative rather than adding a reporting layer, ONES.com is worth considering for project tracking, workflows, and reporting in one platform.
Rich Filters for Jira Dashboards
Product Overview
Rich Filters for Jira Dashboards adds interactive filtering and reporting options to Jira dashboards. Instead of building a separate dashboard for every audience, you can create a shared dashboard and let viewers narrow the displayed issues by project, assignee, status, or other criteria. It is a reporting app for teams that already track work in Jira, not a replacement for Jira’s underlying project or workflow tools.
Why It Was Selected
It addresses a common reporting frustration: Jira dashboards can show useful charts, but teams may need more control over how people filter and compare the underlying work. Rich Filters is worth considering when project leads want to explore sprint or project data without asking an administrator to create a new saved filter or dashboard for every question. Its value depends on having reasonably consistent Jira fields and issue data.
Core Capabilities
You can build a configurable rich filter on top of a Jira saved filter, then use dashboard gadgets to display and explore the matching issues. Smart filters group issues into categories such as status or priority, while dynamic filters let viewers adjust dashboard results interactively. Available gadgets support views such as issue lists, statistics, and two-dimensional breakdowns. Depending on the configuration, teams can also create calculated measures and compare issue counts across selected dimensions.
This works well for practical questions like “Which open defects are blocking this release?” or “How are sprint issues distributed by owner and status?” A project manager can start with a team-level dashboard, then filter it to a particular sprint or assignee during a review. The reports remain tied to Jira issue data, so they can reflect current work without maintaining a separate reporting dataset.
Pros
The main advantage is interactive analysis within Jira dashboards. Reusable filters and gadgets can reduce dashboard duplication, and viewers can investigate a report without editing its underlying setup. It can also make existing Jira fields and saved filters more useful for routine project tracking and agile reviews.
Cons
Rich Filters improves reporting, but it does not fix inconsistent issue data or replace broader portfolio analytics. Complex dashboards can take time to configure and maintain, especially when teams use different workflows or field conventions. It also adds an app dependency, so administrators should check compatibility, permissions, and support for their Jira deployment before adopting it. Teams needing advanced data modeling, cross-system reporting, or executive-level analytics may find it insufficient on its own.
Pricing
Rich Filters is a paid Jira Marketplace app, with pricing generally tied to the Jira deployment and user tier. Check the Atlassian Marketplace listing for current rates, trial terms, and Cloud or self-managed availability; app costs are separate from Jira licensing.
Best For
Jira teams that want more interactive dashboards for sprint tracking, issue status, and project-level reporting—and are comfortable maintaining an additional Marketplace app—are the best fit. It is less compelling if basic Jira reports already answer your questions or if you need analytics beyond Jira’s issue data.
Structure for Jira
Product Overview
Structure for Jira is a Jira app for organizing issues into flexible, spreadsheet-like hierarchies. Instead of relying only on flat issue lists or standard dashboards, you can arrange work into structures that reflect how your team plans and delivers it: initiatives above epics, stories, tasks, and bugs, for example. It is best understood as a way to shape and analyze Jira work, rather than a standalone reporting platform.
Why It Was Selected
It addresses a common reporting problem: Jira issues may contain the right data, but teams struggle to see how individual tickets roll up into a larger project or program. Structure can make those relationships easier to inspect and update. That makes it relevant to a comparison of Jira reporting apps, particularly for teams that need custom views of agile execution and cross-project work.
Core Capabilities
Teams can build structures manually or use generators to populate them from Jira issues and relationships. Configurable columns display issue fields, while formulas and aggregations can calculate or summarize values across levels. Views can be tailored to different planning and tracking needs, and the app can help teams inspect status, ownership, estimates, and other project facts in context. Structure’s Gantt functionality can also support timeline planning, depending on the product edition and setup. These capabilities make it possible to create a working view that connects detailed tickets to higher-level plans without changing the underlying Jira issue model.
Pros
The hierarchy is more adaptable than a fixed Jira issue list, and rollups help teams spot where lower-level work affects a parent initiative. Teams can create views for different audiences without duplicating the underlying issues. It can be useful for portfolio coordination, release planning, and projects where standard Jira reports do not show the relationships stakeholders need.
Cons
Structure adds another model for teams to learn and maintain. Generators and formulas can become difficult to troubleshoot when a structure has many rules or spans multiple projects. It also depends on Jira data quality: missing estimates, inconsistent issue links, or poorly maintained statuses can undermine rollups. Teams primarily looking for polished charts or executive dashboards may still need another reporting app. Large or complex structures can require careful configuration and performance testing.
Pricing
Structure for Jira is a paid Marketplace app. Pricing depends on the Jira hosting option and licensed user tier, so check the current Atlassian Marketplace listing for the applicable rate. Evaluate the license alongside any Jira subscription and other reporting apps your team already uses.
Best For
Structure is a good fit for Jira teams that need configurable, hierarchical views to track work from detailed issues up to epics, initiatives, or programs. It is less compelling if your main need is quick, chart-heavy dashboarding or a simple report that requires little setup.
Power BI Connector for Jira by Alpha Serve
Product Overview
Power BI Connector for Jira by Alpha Serve moves Jira data into Microsoft Power BI, where you can build reports and dashboards using Power BI’s visual and modeling tools. It suits teams that have outgrown Jira’s built-in charts or need to combine project data with information from other business systems. It is a reporting bridge, not a replacement for Jira’s issue tracking or workflow controls.
Why It Was Selected
Jira reporting often gets difficult when stakeholders need portfolio views, custom calculations, or metrics that span several projects. This connector gives teams a route to shape Jira data in Power BI rather than trying to make every report fit Jira’s native dashboard gadgets. The tradeoff is an additional connector, a Power BI environment to administer, and responsibility for keeping reports useful as Jira fields and workflows change.
Core Capabilities
The connector lets teams select Jira data for reporting, apply filters such as JQL, and bring chosen fields into Power BI datasets. From there, analysts can create charts, tables, calculated measures, and dashboards, then combine Jira information with other data sources in Power BI. Refresh options help keep reports current without rebuilding them manually, though the right refresh schedule depends on your reporting needs and setup. This approach can support sprint trends, workload views, issue aging, and cross-project delivery reporting. Validate field coverage, refresh behavior, and supported Jira deployment types against your own environment before committing.
Pros
It opens up Power BI’s flexible visualization and data modeling for Jira reporting, and can make it easier to combine delivery metrics with finance, support, or customer data. Teams can create audience-specific dashboards without relying only on standard Jira gadgets. Analysts who already work in Power BI may also find it easier to maintain complex reporting there.
Cons
This adds another product and data flow to maintain. Teams need Power BI expertise to build and troubleshoot more involved reports, and changes to Jira fields or workflows can affect datasets and measures. Refresh limits, data volume, permissions, and the freshness of reports should be tested with realistic project data. It also does not improve Jira’s day-to-day planning or execution workflows; it reports on them. Stakeholders may end up looking at a separate dashboard rather than the live project record.
Pricing
The connector is a paid Marketplace app, and pricing can vary by Jira edition, deployment, and licensing tier. Power BI licensing may be an additional cost, so check both products’ current prices and confirm whether your intended refresh and sharing setup requires particular Power BI licenses.
Best For
Choose it if your team already uses Power BI and needs richer Jira analytics, cross-project reporting, or combined views of delivery and business data. It is less compelling if you only need a few straightforward sprint or project charts. If the bigger problem is Jira’s broader project-management fit rather than reporting alone, ONES.com is a Jira alternative that brings project management, software development management, workflows, reporting, and knowledge management into one platform.
How to Choose the Right Jira Reporting App
If your team mainly needs sprint burndown, issue status, and project snapshots, try Jira Dashboards and Reports first. A paid add-on may be unnecessary if those views answer your regular questions.
Choose eazyBI when you need deeper analysis across dimensions or historical trends. Custom Charts suits teams that want clearer visual dashboards, while Rich Filters helps when people need to adjust dashboard views interactively.
Consider Structure when work spans nested initiatives, projects, and teams. Choose Power BI Connector for Jira by Alpha Serve when Jira data needs to join broader Power BI reporting.
Evaluate ONES.com when the decision extends beyond reporting to project tracking, configurable workflows, deployment control, and consolidating tools. Its cloud, on-premise, private cloud, and air-gapped options may suit teams with specific hosting requirements.
Before committing, identify the reports people use weekly, confirm that your Jira edition supports the required app, and compare subscription costs at your expected seat count. If migration is possible, test how workflows, fields, reporting, and historical data would carry over.
Selection Summary and Final Recommendation
For simple Jira reporting, begin with native dashboards. Add eazyBI, Custom Charts, Rich Filters, Structure, or the Power BI connector only when a specific reporting gap justifies another app.
If you are reassessing the wider project platform, include ONES.com in the evaluation alongside reporting-focused add-ons. A short trial using real project data can reveal whether its broader workflow and deployment options fit your team better than adding more tools.
FAQs About Choosing a Jira Reporting App
Is Jira’s built-in reporting enough for a project team?
It can be enough for standard issue, sprint, and project status views. Consider an add-on when you need more flexible analysis, interactive filtering, or reporting across complex work structures.
Which Jira reporting app is best for deeper analysis?
eazyBI is designed for multidimensional reporting and custom analysis. If your team already uses Microsoft Power BI for broader analytics, compare the Power BI Connector for Jira by Alpha Serve.
Can I use these reporting tools with Jira Cloud and Data Center?
Availability depends on each app’s edition and current marketplace support. Check compatibility for your specific Jira environment before selecting an app.
What should I check before buying a Jira reporting app?
Confirm that it supports your Jira edition, required fields, and reporting questions. Compare pricing at your seat count, trial the app with representative data, and consider any migration plans.
When should I consider ONES.com instead of another Jira reporting add-on?
Consider ONES.com when you are evaluating a broader project platform, not only a dashboard enhancement. It combines project tracking, configurable workflows, built-in reporting, and multiple deployment options.